Net-Cyrmu www.net-cymru.co.uk
Eich Gwefan Chi / YOUR Site on the Internet



Waste Strategy

This is intended as a discussion document for the Rhondda Waste Forum, a consultaton set up by the Council to involve the waste industry and the community.

It is not a proposal for a particular project, but rather a suggested approach to evaluating projects. A number of desirable features are listed, not in the expectation that all projects will address all points, but rather

It is intended to be neither definitive nor exclusive. It intention, is however, to get away from a "single problem - single solution" framework of thinking, the result of which is likley to leave recycling activity fragmented and limited.

It may that the various objectives can best be met by a number of projects working in collaboration.

To act as stimulus to discussion a specific example is listed, which may illustrate some of the pitfalls involved in some forms of promotion of recycling activity. It is not intended as a criticism of those involved and no specific details such as names are mentioned.


Example - Recycling Bale Wrappings

A small family company has achieved a grant under European Objective 5 in order to collect plastic bale wrappings for recycling.

The bale wrappings consist of a tough inner plastic and an outer wrapping of a more common plastic material. The characteristics required of the inner wrapping makes it impossible or impractical to make it out of recycled material.

The inner wrapping, however, can be recycled into a wood substitute which can be used for fences, gates, etc. It appears to be quite vandal-proof, making it attractive for use as street furniture in urban areas.

The reprocessing can, at present, take place in only one place in Europe - in Scotland.

The company uses the grant to collect the inner wrappings from farms and ship them to Scotland for reprocessing.

Unfortunately the grant is insufficient to enable the company to provide the collection of the wrappings as a free service and farmers are being charged to have the material taken away. Some farmers are reluctant to pay, particularly because it is a solution to disposing of only part of the wrapping material. The farmer is still left with the problem of disposing of the outer wrappings.

{Discussion}

The scheme has one very strong point, namely a particularly useful product can be made from a material which would otherwise be difficult to recycle.

There are, however, a number of important limitations and concerns.

The lengthy transport route means that the project is contributing to both pollution and fuel consumption.

The collection visits to the farms could be used to collect the outer wrappings (which presumably could be recycled for the same use) but because this is excluded from the grant, this is not being done.

From the famers' point of view it is not a solution to their waste problem, something which may lead to the uncontrolled burning of plastics. There are strong environmental concerns about such activity, particularly from the point of releasing dioxins into the atmosphere.


A Stategy in preference to specific solutions to specific problems

The above case illustrates the problems of supporting projects on the basis of financing a single activity.

A strategy should not describe a specific endpoint, but rather indicate what is desirable and be open as to new ideas as to how objectives can be achieved.


Employment, Education and Training

A key aspect of any project is the opportunity to provide immediate employment as well as increasing the education and skills of the workforce.

Recycling activity offers the oppotuinity to acquire a number of transferable skills:
  • Communication and Interpersonal Skills. There will be a considerable level of coordination and liasing between groups, individuals and businesses.
  • IT and administration skills - gathering and storing information (see Intelligence below) and record keeping will be activities central to any project.
  • Environmental awareness. Those working on projects will need to understand the significance of their work. Increasingly businesses will need to be aware of the consequences in terms of the environment and resources of their activities. The Welsh Assembly has recently committed itself to the principle of sustainable development.
  • Science. Recycling activity represents a marvellous opportunity to learn science in a practical environement.


The area of plastics recycling is a particularly fertile area to learn to learn about the polymer chemistry as well as the specific processes involved in producing plastics.

It is an area where we have important expertise available to us locally - see Plastek Industries - an example of recycling in action


Intelligence

Landfill and incineration represent "unintelligent" solutions to the waste management problem. Whether industrial or domestic the sources of the waste are easily identified and predictable and all waste is disposed in the same way.

Recycling involves separating waste and treating different components in different ways. It requires intelligence relating to who is producing what waste and where, and who is a potential user of waste materials, and where.

Recycling activity therefore requires research in order to be effective.

One approach is to set up a Waste Exchange. One Waste Exchange exists already for Wales (www.waste-exchange.org) but this appears to be very limited. On a recent visit I looked for potential consumers of waste under a number of categories. Every category I looked at was empty.
This appears to support anecdotal evidence that the main obstacle to recycling at present appears to be the problem of finding places willing to reprocess waste.

It also indicates that current levels of intelligence regarding reprocessing activity is woefully inadequate.

Any recycling projects undertaken are unlikely to be very successful unless there is parallel research activity. Anything undertaken needs to be more locally based and more comprehensive than anything undertaken to date.

I have described elsewhere ( Waste Exchanges ) what I consider to be the minimum requirements for a successful waste exchange.


Identifying and promoting waste reprocessing

Currently recycling appears to be limited by a lack of companies willing to accept waste for reprocessing.

In addition to identifying companies already active in waste reprocessing, the intelligence gathering process should also be able to identify "market gaps" where companies could become active. They could be attracted to the area by reasonably assured markets in additional to any financial subsidies.

One particular gap appears to be the recycling of newspapers into newsprint. Newspapers are both produced and consumed locally but there is at present no system locally for reprocessing the newsprint.

Hopefully other potentially fruitful reprocessing opportunities can be identified.


Integration and Extension

As projects are undertaken experiences will indicate further developments which may be viable.

If further finance is required it should be on the basis of additional benefits vs. additional {marginal} costs, which may be small if it involves only a minor modification of existing activity.

Extending the bale wrapping recycling to include the outer wrapping would be an example of such an extension.

If the materials can be sold for more than the addional cost of collection, this would reduce the subsidy needed to make the project viable. Those undertaking projects should be encouraged to look for opportunities to sensibly extend their projects.


Recycling Hierarchy

It is important to establish a hierarchy of recycling activity, of which the following is a suggestion:

  • Waste reduction and waste avoidance - e.g. promote reusable bottles
  • Reuse of production scrap - e.g. offcuts in sheet-metal production
  • Recycling waste for the same same or similar reuse - e.g. recylcing newsprint
  • Recycling waste for lower value use than the original - e.g. making plastic containers using waste from a variety of sources
  • Use for composting and mulch
  • Incineration or landfill


Projects should be evaluated on their position in the hierarchy, in addition to other factors mentioned in this document.


Minimising transport - keeping things local

Energy costs should be considered a negative factor when judging projects.

Transport is likely to be a significant component of the energy cost for many projects and therefore projects which involve local reprocessing and local reuse.


Removing toxic materials from the waste stream

However the residual waste is disposed of, its burden on the environment will be less if toxic materials have been removed.

Batteries of all sorts represent a particular environmental hazard. Some countries oblige companies who produce batteries to accept used batteries in exchange.


Landfill and Incineraton - keeping options open

One fundamental difference between landfill and incineration is that landfills have a lifetime capacity whereas burning has a rate capacity.

Landfills will always be fully used in time. Incineration plants, on the other hand, have a rate capacity. This means that if the amount of residual waste declines, then there is the risk of bearing the capital cost of unused capacity.

The pressure to make viable the capital expenditure on any incineration plant built could stifle recycling activity or any other activity (such as waste reduction) which decreases the amount of residual waste.

Proceding with building incineration plant should, therefore, procede with extreme caution.

Incineration invokes concerns relating to emissions, prticularly dioxins. The danger is increased if incineration of waste is undertaken in the absence of recycling activity, which could remove much of the toxic material from the waste stream.

Incineration also suffers from being capital intensive, with significantly less opportunity for creating employment than equivalent money spent in recycling.


Potential Partners

  1. Existing waste companies
  2. Local companies with experience of recycling
  3. Community groups - especially those with experience of recycling - but not excluding others
  4. Individuals who can offer particular skills and experience



Summary of Plus and Minus Points for evaluating projects

{Plus Points}
  • Labour intensive
  • Opportunities for improving workforce skills
  • Research leading to improved recycling in the future
  • Quantity of material recycled and its position of the Recycling Hierarchy
  • Improving public awareness of environmental and recycling issues
  • Removing toxic materials from the waste stream
  • Flexibility to permit future extension or modification
  • Local reprocessing and reuse
  • Well integrated with other activities


{Minus Points}
  • Capital intensive
  • Limited to manual jobs with little opportunity to learn new skills
  • Large energy use - long distance transport
  • Project itself is a source of pollution
  • Inflexible - incapable of extension - poorly integrated with other recycling activities


    Outcomes

    The same criteria used for selection should be used for determining outcomes.

    Outcomes should include at least some quantitative targets for each project, but also include some qualitative outcomes (eg. description of activities which aim to raise awareness of recycling amongst schoolchildren).

    Sufficient flexibility should be maintained in setting targets to permit modification or extension in the light of experience.

    Preliminary research should be undertaken to determine activities which are most likely to make the most significant contribution (in the long term as well as in the short term) to waste reduction.

    Information should be regarded as a useful commodity and the provision of useful information should be regarded as a successful outcome. Any information produced by subsidised activity activity should (unless there are clear and declared reasons for keeping it confidential) be placed in the Public Domain with free access to anyone to reproduce or transform, so long as the original source is acknowledged.

    In addition to quantity, the success of information-generating projects should be judged according to:
-Accuracy -Timeliness - Is it up-to-date? -Relevance - Are those who are able to use the information able to access easily it in a format which meets their needs?


    This Website contains information from a variety of sources. References on this site to individuals and organisations does not imply a support on their part for Net-Cymru - see Site Objectives and Policies

    This page was last updated on 5 November 2000 __________ Back to:net-cymru Home Page